|
To
develop a risk analysis of a project it is important to
undertake the following stages:
These risk reviews should be carried out at crucial stages or
time intervals within the project life-cycle. Risk management
activities are performed continually between risk reviews based
on the analyses, strategies and plans produced by the preceding
risk review.
Risk identification
The
aims of this phase are to:
-
identify all significant types and sources of risk and
uncertainty associated with each of the objectives and the key
parameters relating to these objectives
-
ascertain the causes of each risk
-
assess how risks are related to other risks and how risks
should be classified and grouped for evaluation
This is a crucial phase. If a risk is not identified it cannot
be evaluated and managed.
Having identified as many risks as practicable, it is beneficial
to classify and if appropriate group risks to assist in their
evaluation.
Creating a risk assessment team, from key stakeholders connected
to the project, can make a valuable contribution to effective
project management. The team can be brought together for a
brainstorming session to review the risks previously identified
by the project team and to flush out further risks. As a result,
the potential risks identified might be extended and revised in
the light of the results of the brainstorming. The process of
searching for and responding to risks is iterative.
Risk analysis
The
risk assessment operates at two different, but related, levels:
Using a Risk Assessment Matrix enter the rating for the
probability (P) of the risk occurring in the ‘P’ column.
Consider how likely it is that this risk will happen in terms of
the specific nature and context of the project.
Record the rating of the impact (I) of the risk should it
occur in column ‘I’ on the matrix. This enables assessment of
the effect this risk will have if it occurs on the achievement
of the aims and objectives of the project.
The
score is rated on a scale of 1 – 5 with 1 being the lowest
probability/impact (PI) ratio.
To
calculate the probability or impact ratio (PI), multiply the
scores in each column (P x I) so you are combining the
likelihood of the risk occurring with the consequence.
Therefore the highest PI ratio score possible is 25.
Identified potential risks should be analysed, with a tentative
indication of the significance of each risk (clearly
significant; PI score above 17, possibly significant; PI score
above 10, and probably insignificant; PI score under 10) and
inter-relationships between risks.
If
a risk is related to one or more other risks - in the sense that
they share common causes or for other reasons the occurrence of
one affects the likelihood of another - the related risks should
be evaluated together. The resulting assessment of each risk or
group of related risks should be entered in the risk matrix.
The
significance of risks should be reviewed and then they should be
reclassified into the categories of significance. For risks,
which are 'probably insignificant' (ie low score on PI ratio),
the decision must be made as to whether they can be ignored.
Particular attention and care must be taken with identifying and
classifying risks which could have either:
-
serious or catastrophic consequences or high expected values,
or
-
exceptionally favourable consequences
All
the risks in both of these categories are likely to need
particular, individual attention when assessing the overall 'riskiness'.
A decision must be made about which risks are amenable to more
detailed evaluation and quantification.
Risk mitigation/Control
of risks
Mitigating risks, or lessening their adverse impacts, is at the
heart of the effective management of risk. Risk mitigation
should cover all phases of a project from inception to
completion. There are four main ways in which risks can be dealt
with within the context of a risk management strategy.
Risks can be:
-
reduced or eliminated
-
transferred
-
avoided
-
absorbed or pooled
The
key task during this stage is the monitoring of risks included
in the risk analysis matrix. Other risks also need to be
monitored regularly including those in the remaining stages of
the project not only the risks occurring in the present stage.
Any significant changes in risk or new risks should be
identified and assessed immediately.
Regular monitoring of risks can be undertaken by studying
events, situations or changes (sometimes called 'trends'), which
could potentially affect risks during the normal management and
progress of a project. |